politics

Dhruv Rathee, Abhijit Dabke and the 'Cockroach Janata Party': Is Sonam Wangchuk's Hunger Strike Becoming a Political Project?

As Sonam Wangchuk's fast enters Day 17, Abhijit Dabke's remarks on Dhruv Rathee's alleged role have intensified debate over the protest's direction.

News Setu
Dhruv Rathee, Abhijit Dabke and the 'Cockroach Janata Party': Is Sonam Wangchuk's Hunger Strike Becoming a Political Project?

As Sonam Wangchuk enters the 17th day of his indefinite hunger strike, questions are being raised not only about his declining health but also about the political ecosystem that appears to be developing around the protest. The spotlight has now shifted to YouTuber Dhruv Rathee and activist Abhijit Dabke following statements made by Dabke in an interview with The Indian Express.

According to Dabke, he reached out to Dhruv Rathee during the early stages of building the movement. He claimed that Rathee connected him with individuals who could help organise and strengthen the protest. Dabke further stated that several RTI activists later became part of the campaign, leading to speculation about whether the movement has expanded beyond its original objectives.

These remarks have triggered a fresh political debate. Critics argue that the protest may now be serving a larger political purpose, while supporters maintain that involving activists and volunteers is a normal feature of democratic movements.

Meanwhile, Sonam Wangchuk's health has reportedly deteriorated after more than two weeks without food, with reports suggesting significant weight loss and falling sugar levels. At the same time, social media has circulated videos showing other organisers participating in routine activities, prompting criticism from some sections of the public.

This has led to an important question: Is the priority still Sonam Wangchuk's cause, or is the protest gradually turning into a platform for political mobilisation? As more information comes to light, greater transparency from all those involved will be essential to maintain public trust.

The debate is no longer limited to the hunger strike itself—it is increasingly about who is shaping the movement, what their objectives are, and whether the original purpose of the protest remains at its core.

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, News Setu makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk.